Nathan Bowers states quite a controversial statement in his post from last year: “Can you name a web startup that got better after it was acquired?”. He says he can’t and gives a few examples.
Feedburner: Google folded them into their own login scheme. Google added crummy ad options to feeds. Otherwise the product is stuck. Feels undead.
What they should be working on: improving the display of RSS feeds, making RSS feel more like a human connection between publisher and reader, fixing the fact that when you put an RSS button on your site it’s a dumb, non-stateful button (compare RSS buttons to Tumblr or Twitter follow functionality).
I have to say, personally, that in my opinion many of the acquisitions fail in the sense that they won’t enable the original founder to take his idea and execution further. I believe it’s this gap in the end result that may give many people the feel that acquisitions in general fail.
What do you think?
Link: Can you name a web startup that got better after it was acquired? (uxhero.com).
Editor’s note: What are these short posts all about? Read our announcement regarding the link-posts.